A Peakto alternative for photographers with one catalog
Peakto Search is a meta-catalog: a Mac app plus Lightroom plugin that indexes photos across Lightroom, Apple Photos, Capture One, and old Aperture libraries, then searches all of them at once. If your photos are scattered like that, it is the right tool. If everything you shoot lives in one Lightroom Classic catalog, you are paying for unification you do not need - Smart Search ($39, one-time) does AI search inside the catalog itself.
Full disclosure: I build Smart Search. Where Peakto's approach wins, I say so below.
Peakto, from the French company CYME, answers a question a lot of long-time photographers genuinely have: my photos are spread across four apps and two decades, how do I search all of it? DPReview's write-up covers it well - you can even load several Lightroom catalogs and query them together, offline drives included.
But here is the question worth asking before you install a second cataloging system: is your library actually scattered? Because if the honest answer is "no, it is all in one Lightroom Classic catalog I have kept since 2014", the meta-catalog architecture solves a problem you do not have, and brings baggage you will feel.
What Peakto Search actually is
Peakto Search is two pieces: a standalone Mac app that builds its own index of your libraries, and a Lightroom Classic plugin that lets you query that index from inside Lightroom. Searches can be text prompts or visual similarity, and the AI runs on-device - nothing uploads.
The architecture is the point. Because Peakto keeps its own database outside any one app, it can see everything: multiple Lightroom catalogs, Apple Photos, Capture One, Aperture libraries Apple abandoned a decade ago. That is a real capability nobody else in the Lightroom plugin space offers.
When Peakto is the right answer
- Your photos live in more than one app. The whole product exists for this. Nothing below matches it.
- You juggle multiple Lightroom catalogs - one per year, one per client - and want one search box across all of them.
- You have archives on offline drives. Peakto's index remembers what is on disks that are not plugged in.
If two of those three describe you, stop reading and go try Peakto. The rest of this post is for the other photographer: the one-catalog kind.
The cost of the meta-catalog you do not need
Running a second cataloging system next to Lightroom is not free, even when it works well:
- A second index to build and maintain. Scott Wyden Kivowitz's review notes the initial indexing is hungry - it is a background app doing real work.
- The intelligence stays outside your catalog. The same review's biggest wish: Peakto cannot write its keywords back into the Lightroom catalog. Your search smarts live in Peakto's database, not in the catalog you will still have in ten years.
- One more app to keep open, update, and pay for.
So what does the one-catalog photographer actually need? Search that lives where the photos already are.
Search inside the catalog instead: the $39 route
I built Smart Search as a native Lightroom Classic plugin with no companion app. You index your catalog once, then type plain English - "kids jumping into the lake at sunset" - and matching photos surface. Everything runs on your Mac's neural engine; nothing uploads.
The design decision that matters in this comparison: results are written back into the catalog. A search becomes keywords and collections you keep. Ten years from now, when plugins and apps have come and gone, those keywords are still in your catalog, portable to whatever you use next. That is the exact opposite of the meta-catalog trade-off.
The honest limits: one catalog at a time, Lightroom Classic only, and it needs an Apple Silicon Mac. No cross-app search, no offline-drive index, no similarity-by-example. I wrote up the full workflow in this walkthrough.
The Aperture lesson: where should the intelligence live?
There is a quiet irony in Peakto's feature list. One of its selling points is rescuing Aperture libraries - archives orphaned when Apple killed the app in 2015 and took a decade of photographers' organization down with it. Every star, every album structure that lived only inside Aperture's database had to be rescued or rebuilt.
That is the strongest argument I know for a simple rule: keep the intelligence in the catalog, not in the tool. Apps die. Plugins die - mine included, someday. Databases that live next to your photos instead of inside your catalog become tomorrow's rescue project.
Run the test on anything in this category: if this tool disappeared next year, what would I keep? With Peakto, you would keep your photos, but the cross-app index and its keywords go with the app. With Smart Search, the keywords and collections it created are ordinary Lightroom keywords and collections - they outlive the plugin, export with your catalog, and transfer to whatever you migrate to in 2035. Excire sits in between: its automatic keywords can be written to your photos, which is one of the things the $199 buys.
The third option: the Excire bundle
For completeness: Excire Search 2026 ($199, Windows and Mac) is the suite play - search plus faces, duplicates, aesthetic ratings, culling, and video keywording, all inside Lightroom Classic. Excire even runs its own "Peakto alternative" landing page, which tells you how directly these two compete.
If you want several of those tools, the bundle is fair value; if you want search alone, it is a $160 premium over Smart Search. I broke that math down feature by feature in the Excire alternatives post.
How to choose
Frequently asked questions
Does Peakto Search work on Windows?
Peakto is a Mac product. Windows photographers wanting AI search in Lightroom Classic should look at Excire Search, which supports both platforms.
Do any of these upload my photos?
No. Peakto, Smart Search, and Excire all run their AI on your machine. Client work stays private with any of the three - this whole category exists partly because cloud Lightroom's semantic search requires uploading everything.
Does AI search replace keywording?
Mostly, going forward - that is the honest pitch of the whole category. You stop keywording routine shoots because the AI reads content directly. Where manual keywords stay worth it: client names, job numbers, and anything a vision model cannot see in the pixels. My preferred workflow is letting searches generate the keywords - search for "beach weddings", save the result as a keyword, and the catalog gets smarter with zero typing.
What if I use several Lightroom Classic catalogs?
Honest answer: that is Peakto's home turf, since it can index and search several catalogs together. Smart Search works inside one catalog at a time - fine if you keep one master catalog, a real limitation if you split by year or client.
One catalog? Search it in plain English. $39, one-time, runs entirely on your Mac.
Get Smart Search - $39